Pages

Thursday 22 May 2014

THE STRANGE CASE OF STUART SYVRET, DATA PROTECTION & THE INTERNET TROLL.




Another snapshot of the Jersey ‘justice’ system – where ‘the law’ is changeable according to who you are…

Being pleased to receive some assistance from our cousins across the channel in France relating to our Strasbourg application – this arising out of complete disbelief on their part at how those who control Jersey’s ‘justice’ system continue to twist and abuse it at will to secure the desired Establishment result – the conversation got me on to thinking of how the Data Protection ‘law’ was infamously manipulated against former Senator Stuart Syvret.

Indeed, the timing for putting up this post seemed pretty ideal as I had decided that due to some rather interesting ‘happenings’ I have set for around the end of September/October I needed to take a break from regular blogging at least until nearer the election. And secondly, I had just had yet another experience of what passes for ‘law’ in the Birt and Bailhache epoch Jersey Twilight Zone via Viscount Michael Wilkins’ collusion with the State media regarding our politically manipulated ‘Désastre’.

More about this episode in a future post no doubt. Yet in the meantime please check out this link to my interview on the excellent Voiceforchildren Blog.

Stuart Syvret and the notorious Data Protection ‘secret court case’ scam

Here, should any readers not be aware, four Establishment proxies (there was actually meant to be five but one refused to go along with the ruse having been written to by Data Protection asking him to come in and join them) including one middle-aged, internet troll and convicted petty criminal we shall call for the sake of humour and upsetting his sense of deluded importance, Boozy D’ Eathreat were provided with the better part of £500,000 of our taxpayers’ money by the Data Protection Commissioner’s Office. These monies being to cover ‘legal advice’ costs to take former Senator Syvret to court and prosecute him regarding material on his internet blog.

The actual cost of the whole scam in fact ran in to millions as I know firsthand from one of those involved in the process. However, what really needs to be focussed on for the purposes of this particular post is that Mr D’ Eathreat was allowed access to this taxpayer’s money despite the fact that what Stuart Syvret had actually written about him being an abusive and cowardly cyber bully was demonstrably true. As at least nine other complainants to the police I am now aware of can confirm. Imagine that, readers – in Jersey such is the break down of law and order that you can now actually be taken to court for telling the truth! All our judiciary need to do to succeed is simply ban you from providing the evidence or calling any witnesses.

Yet it must also be flagged up – especially given the anti-Syvret propaganda pumped out by Establishment Party organs such as the Jersey Evening Pravda – that whatever one thinks about the former Senator’s decision to name the secret court case proxies on his blog it remains an undeniable truth that the former Senator does have a wholly sustainable defence in his claim to have done so in what he considered to be – rightly or wrongly – the ‘public interest’. Certainly one hell of a stronger case than Viscount Wilkins’ has in his pandering to the whims of his mates in the Establishment court and media in our ‘Désastre’ case!

The differing judicial attitude to Syvret and Boozy D’ Eathreat actually sums up ‘the Jersey Way’ to a T

You see this Establishment proxy – a perma-Stella-ed, work-shy, scumbag, who has for years viciously attacked not just Syvret himself but many others including Shona and myself and even victims of child abuse on the internet using a whole plethora of fake avatars (James Le Gallais, James Pearce, Sue Young, Julie Hanning, Percy Luce, Monty Man Hunter etcetera) to try and conceal his sick and cowardly actions can have no such defence whatsoever. NONE! Boozy D’ Eathreat’s abuse of innocent people is down to pure, twisted maliciousness and jealousy. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Yet guess what? When approached for the same support to take this truly horrible bully to court - surprise, surprise - the Data Protection Commissioner claimed that she ‘could not do so’. Because this internet troll is apparently – and I quote here: ‘not a data controller like Syvret is’. In fact according to the Data Protection Commissioner’s very own words once again our Mr D’ Eathreat ‘is just a kitchen table blogger’. ‘Syvret’ in contrast she told me ‘even calls himself a journalist.’


Wondering what a ‘kitchen table blogger’ is?

Me too!  Because, even though I asked the Commissioner to kindly explain, her answers left me largely none the wiser. You see someone writing on the internet can call him or her self whatever they like – investigative journalist; reporter; political activist – anything. Most of course use plain and simple old ‘blogger’. The best are also quite open about who they – we - are.

The key issue here then is that such claims don’t actually automatically have any legal standing whatsoever. Syvret, after all, may use the term ‘journalist’ even though – just like other individuals such as Mr Rico Sorda for example – he is not actually employed or contracted by anyone. Indeed, such people in truth are ‘employed’ only by their social conscience; their ‘contract’ being only with their commitment to social justice.

Indeed, it is a similar story with the guff used in court against Syvret in throwing around the term ‘data controller’. Is Syvret any more a ‘data controller’ writing his blog than the sick and vicious internet troll who sets up and controls fake political forums where he uses avatars to both register it and spout his easily identifiable hatred as if this was coming from real people?

Or who even sets up bogus blogs - again registered under fake names - to do the same? Indeed, is Syvret or any other of us who write in our own name on personal and genuine blogs more of a ‘data controller’ than the sick and twisted troll who undoubtedly ‘controls’ the hateful bile he pumps out – i.e. the ‘information’ via Twitter of Facebook? Hateful information we know even pillars of the State media such as BBC Jersey Managing Editor, Jon Gripton are evidently happy to re-tweet as ‘amusing’.

No - Syvret is not

The truth is this whole ‘data controller’ concept is actually one originally intended to be utilised in relation to big business and institutions and was never constructed with the idea of being used against the likes of Syvret at all. It has simply been seized upon here in the courts of Jersey – the Hazzard County of the English Channel – as a convenient additional tool of Establishment oppression. (Who is Jersey’s Boss Hogg? Answers on a postcard…)

As for an individual like our Mr D’ Eathreat being able to pump out his cowardly hate to bully people he becomes fixated upon year after year without fear of falling foul of either Data Protection or the police because he is a ‘kitchen table blogger’ this also utter garbage. The term’s legal standing is zero. Both agencies are fully aware of who this creature is and what he does. They both know there is a huge file of complaints about him. They also know that he could – as both honest local and UK police officers have confirmed to me - be charged under the Harassment Law and should have been.

But charged he isn’t

As for me personally, having pursued all of the correct complaint procedures following the years of sickening and vicious abuse from this social inadequate scumbag and yet still seen the authorities do absolutely nothing I actually can’t wait to be taken to court having decided my last resort was to stand up to this thug.

You see one little thing the Jersey Establishment Party may not have realised in deliberately allowing this freak’s reign of abuse to go on and on is that - finally - there are a great many of his victims who are now willing to give evidence about the how they have been abused and then betrayed by the authorities meant to protect them. And unlike James Pearce, James Le Gallais, Sue Young, Julie Hanning, Alan Gower and Uncle Tom Cobbley and all – they are all real!

Keep the Faith

PS

In the meantime should you be one of this thug’s victims yet somehow suddenly find yourself down the police station due to one of his own bogus complaints (D’ Eathreat has made dozens of them!) please just remember this.. The police actually need a Centenier to charge you. It can’t – as it appears happened recently - be attempted by a couple of the mates the troll is always bragging about. And when you get out of the station if you haven’t got anyone else to turn to feel free to give me a call so I can add your name to the list… 

62 comments:

  1. Bloody hell! A kitchen table blogger? What kind of pathetic excuse is that for letting a thug abuse all and sundry? Jeez, what a place we live in.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can I contact you in confidence Trevor because I know who it is you are referring to in this blog and have some information i'm too scared to take to the police in case he finds out about me telling on him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that. Sending you my email & mobile number reference the not for publication comment. Keeping silent is how these type of cowardly bullies win. You are not alone - keep that in your mind at all times.

      Delete
  3. Whoops! Cocked up that reply in trying to kill two birds with one stone. Reference no for publication 2 my mobile is 07797 824243 or at tpitman@thebaldtruthjersey.co.uk. Time for bed obviously!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another load of tosh about the same person you and 3 others constantly harass online.
    Maybe you have not noticed, but nobody has the time or energy to engage with you and the fool Syvret anymore, but then again whenever either of you clowns appear in the news its always something humiliating to laugh at :-0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mr D'Eathreat I always enjoy both your delusion and your ill-educated comments.

      Delete
  5. Listen to it making effeminate death threats in the recorded phone call here:

    http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-reminder-of-jerseys-freaks.html

    The Nazi party throwback boasts of his protection by the Jersey authorities. Evidently true as it was only bound over for one of his many attacks; and only then because Ex Health Minister Syvret shrewdly complained in court of witness intimidation during one of the peado-protecting establishment show trials he was subjected to.
    It was caught on tape so they could not ignore it or deal with it at parish hall level as they had planned.


    How did this Nazi throwback and his dodgy friends get to be awarded over £300,000 to pursue an unprecedented legal vendetta to gag Ex Health Minister Syvret from publishing his knowledge.

    Over to you Emma Martins, awarder of public monies to bullies, bent coppers & child rapists.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Does Maureen Morgan realise she is playing with fire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maureen Morgan remember.

      She won about piddly 50 votes at the by election yet accounted for about 80% of the biomass of the candidates

      She was one of the most active bullies linked to the death of Simon Abbot.

      http://dearjon-letter.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/jerseys-su-mo-witch-morgan-gets-boot.html

      It would be nice to be able to forget but I have this feeling that she will be a blot on the landscape for some time to come.

      She probably can't help herself.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Thanks for the link
      We note that due to a copying error that blog posting by Jersey's Ex Health Minister is currently showing zero comments.

      We have just re-submitted the 282 comments from the original saved file and these should be uploaded soon.

      Delete
  8. The person in question is obviously the person behind the fake avatar crazy that has been sweeping a certain Facebook group. James Pearce, Sue Young & Julie Hanning all carry that unforgettable signature. Keep the faith Mr Pitman. I hope that you can move forward and leave this nasty stuff behind.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When it comes to bullying on the internet Maureen Morgan is in a league of her own.

    #RIP Simon Abbott.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good on you for standing up to the bully. If data protection and the police won't do anything about him what other options are there?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Syvret protects abuse victims and the trolls attack them. That's why Syvret gets prosecuted and the trolls don't. #PedoJersey.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How many poor people has meeeester DeathThreat bullied? He is a coward and that the police and Martins do nothing says it all.

    ReplyDelete
  13. #pedojersey

    Love it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The psychology of internet trolls -

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html

    ReplyDelete
  15. Tony's Musings
    Jersey Historic Abuse Inquiry: Guest Posting - Today, with permission from Carrie Modral to re-post, I have a guest posting from her regarding the Jersey "Historic" Abuse Inquiry.

    http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2014/05/jersey-historic-abuse-inquiry-guest.html

    It is an appeal for all witnesses to come forward.

    Like any Establishment inquiry it is organised to minimise the embarrassment (and the effectiveness) and probably skewed to achieve the outcomes favouring the paymasters (vis Hilsborough)

    Retired Deputy DW and others have serious concerns regarding the protocols and the terms of reference

    It is a very expensive inquiry due to the set up, with culpable officials and the "great and good" being provided with near unlimited legal assistance at taxpayer's expense, but witnesses such as the whistleblower Ex Health Minister being given none, and also still being subject to superinjunctions and much evidence only being taken behind closed doors.

    Ex Health Minister Syvret raised some early concerns at:

    http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/the-publics-inquiry-into-the-public-inquiry-starts-here/

    There seems to be a dilemma whether to co-operate with the inquiry given it's faults.
    Indeed the shysters write the rules and run the show but my feeling is that a boycott or partial boycott of the inquiry just plays into their hands.

    Perhaps bloggers and interested parties should get together with a view to formulating a united front. Perhaps witnesses could ensure that their evidence is not "lost" or ignored by providing a written summary of it to trusted bloggers such as VFC, Rico or Stuart.

    Also perhaps the shortcomings of the inquiry can be presented to the inquiry ........ They can ignore this evidence but at least it's presentation can be documented by bloggers.

    Something else that bothers me is that my understanding is that those who have been in receipt of compensation are subject to a gagging clause. Is this the case?

    In short GIVE EVIDENCE[?] This could be tho last best chance. Discuss..........

    ReplyDelete
  16. Have to ask Trev.
    In the picture on the posting, is that Jonny having his morning ablution's, or is that how he wakes up most mornings?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Good post and on the money as usual. Just how Stuart could be abused in this way is shocking and yet we should all know by now that nothing should shock us in Jersey.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Should just slip in an apology to those who have asked about me not updating so regularly. Just necessary to take a step back as 'the project' needs my full attention.

    Break also doing me good having not been very well as it is has allowed me to step back and laugh at the small band of loonies who live on the net 24/7. Loonies not posting anything of value but just hate and crap.

    My God but I have become so aware how pitiful and in need of help they are. Whatever will the Jon's, Maureen's and Micks of this world tell their families one day when their abuse and bullying is questioned? Sad really.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This post has obviously rather upset the drunken bully at the centre of the article. He has been sending multiple comments - all childishly abusive - in his usual plethora of fake names.

    No wonder the mrs goes to bed alone eh? Chaining smoking, multiple Stella consumption all alone in a darkened room at 4am. How very sad Jonnie No. Mates.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Not your greatest fan Mr Pitman. but what I will say is that you certainly did represent those who voted you in to office. As did your wife. But this viscount business is very wrong. An abuse of power to batter you both down pure and simple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment. Many people who would clearly not be of the same political leanings have said the same. As these people say it really could not be any more transparent as to what the Viscount's motives were in doing this.

      Delete
  21. Its pointless even trying to engage with an arsehole like you because since losing everything and being made an Island laughing stock your relevance is zero.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Jon. Such an irrelevance that you take up your busy day to write about me again, and again, and again.

      Yet I actually enjoy reading your multiple rants because I can still find it in my heart to feel sorry for you. Laughing stock as you are.

      Delete
  22. Trevor.

    A Witch-Hunt........In The Public Interest? PART TWO.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Glad to see the second part of your interview up on THE VOICE. You have me intrigued on your forthcoming project you mention. Keep up the good work mate. As for this kitchen table blogger stuff what a joke of an excuse. How much do we pay this woman?

    ReplyDelete
  24. This nasty piece of work who attacked Stuart Syvret and so many others sounds like someone with low self-esteem. Probably I would suggest also someone who either can't hold down a regular job or who is unemployable and happy to live off the taxpayer for year after year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Had a lovely comment from our Mr D'Eathreat which I haven't published. Pure invention out of his Stella addled mind of course. But just waiting to see if it ends up on line under any of his avatars before acting. Yes, Mr Syvret certainly was spot on in his analysis of the thug.

      Delete
  25. Mr Pitman.
    Nice to see that, you at last are believing in Mr Syvret.

    ReplyDelete
  26. What does it say about your island when your justice apparatus can blatantly treat people so differently? To me it says that your island or more accurately those who control it are corrupt. I don't think I'll be visiting for an holiday any time soon.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Just a question for you. Have you noticed that one of deathreat's fake avatars has vanished, this being James Pearce? What can. Jon be up to?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Syvret's treatment as highlighted by you is shocking. The most disturbing part is that someone can evidently be taken to court for telling the truth. if this doesn't scare people I don't know what will.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Surely a data protection law should never have been used in the case you highlight? To an outsider this just makes of manipulating the law to achieve a desired result.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Have you considered doing another interview on your "road to Strasbourg" with the People's Voice or Voice For Children? Worth doing I think as your story is shocking.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Might well do but not before my first session of giving evidence to the child abuse inquiry next week.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Terry Le Main wants to come down and watch you give evidence by the sounds of it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. As one of the victims of a bully named J S Haworth I can say that everything I read written by Syvret about this individual was bang on. A disgusting bully who should be in jail IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just how many victims of this coward are there I wonder? And to think he brags about him taking people to court! Need a full day with all the people willing to talk now. Can't wait to hear Bowron's excuses for not taking any action and the same must go for the AG.

      Delete
  34. A lovely 'anonymous' comment sent through from the old forger of old lady's signatures, Tel Boy. Oh my love how sad you are...

    ReplyDelete
  35. Getting my papers together in readiness to give evidence to the Committee of Inquiry into the States concealed child abuse scandal.

    So much to include.

    Should I just go with everything that has been brought out since victims began approaching me; and since I began to dig into the information provided which then resulted in even more evidence?

    Likewise the truth that began to emerge when the Scrutiny Panel I chaired exposed the lies deliberately spun by individuals including police officers, politicians and our mainstream media?

    Or should I even include far older material? I think that I know the answer.

    Meanwhile, it also makes one wonder what motivates the tiny collection of haters who attack victims and those who stand up for them on the net? Most decent human beings only want justice t come out of all of this for the people who have suffered.

    One can only conclude - especially knowing what I do - that one or two of these have something to hide and of which they are desperate to try and bully people - including me - into silence about.

    Well, sorry loves but you just won't succeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He who laughs last1 June 2014 at 18:04:00 BST

      You are so full of shit.
      There is nothing you can add that is not already known by the Police and the COI already know about your chip on shoulder since being made bankrupt.
      You will get nowhere with this just like everything else you foolishly try to do.

      Delete
    2. Just published this to show how desperate a certain convicted petty criminal is getting.

      Well, dear boy (well middle-aged loser really!) I'm told the COI have already been filled in on your obsession with attacking victims of abuse etc?

      Perhaps time to just plead insanity? With all of the witnesses now can't think much else will save you in a corrupt system like ours.

      Delete
  36. Nothing to do with the data protection issue but I just stumbled upon the Filthy Rag story reporting how Terry Le Main had had to resign from the Island Development Committee back in the 80s. Can send you a scan if you like?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the offer but I have all the documentation already. Even some minutes from IDC when he had to resign. Make a good blog perhaps if he wasn't so irrelevant? Also have a very interesting court document relating to a threatening phone call! No wonder some people are chums....

      Delete
  37. Trevor. Its such a loss, you not bring in the States, not asking these kind of questions: “Will H.M. Attorney General explain to Members the rationale
    behind the Viscount’s recent decision to release creditor details of bankrupts to the media in the ‘public interest’ and will he explain what consultation, if any, the Viscount took, with whom and when, and what limits or qualifications there are to this publication?”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What underlay this was just a continuation of the corrupt legalabuse of Shona and I by Michael Birt's 'justice' system - this time via his friend the Viscount.

      I'm afraid this is what happens to people who refuse to play along with the decades of abuse cover ups. All the more for Strasbourg in the long run.

      Fair play to Deputy Higgins for highlighting our we were singled out for this. Yes, odd how one can be amongst Jersey's richest people, go bankrupt, and yet no such action on part of State media or Viscount?

      Delete
  38. Thanks for the usual rants Jon. Another difficult night, eh? Can't sleep again worrying about the police finally having to act due to the huge amount of evidence? Wife turfed you out again because of the drinking? Never mind all be over in good time I expect. Look on the bright side - once inside you will be able to get the help you need.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Trevor.

    An Article 6 Human Right Compliant JERSEY?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Ex-Deputy Pitman said: "Who is Jersey’s Boss Hogg?"

    Anon replied: The Crown!

    Yes we have the local swine, but ultimately its a feudal pigdom and "Boss Hogg" has always been the Crown.

    The City of London Corporation run this island, and the Crown allow it; get in the way of City-and-Crown business and you get trampled on by all the crowns piggy-wiggies!

    Believe it or not, this island is now the 12th most densely populated place on Earth, listed between Bangladesh and Taiwan. Jersey is fast becoming the Hong Kong of the West. Into this western Hong Kong billions of pounds flow and move around a linked series of tax-avoidance vehicles (tax havens).

    Do not think local Mr Pitman, think global.


    ReplyDelete
  41. Quote from the always immaculate "boatyboy"

    http://planetjersey.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,242.msg59155.html#msg59155


    " How can an open minded, professional committee grant legal representation to some witnesse's but not others.

    Is this another whitewash, is this another Dame Steel or Electoral Commission where the outcome is decided before the inquiry even starts ?

    Whether you love him or hate him, Stuart Syvret by virtue of his past office - should be involved and invited, (with legal representation ) to be questioned by the CoI. and to submit his own evidence. To put it simply, if not why not and what are they afraid of ?

    The Committee of Enquiry that is supposed to be hunting the truth, the whole truth.

    http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/jerseys-public-inquiry-into-child-abuse/

    END"


    The best policy remains for EVERYONE to partake and offer evidence to the enquiry -but to state and register their concerns or lack of confidence in aspects of the inquiry. This inquiry is set up and funded by people, including those who wish to conceal as much as possible of the truth.

    Jersey requires that this is a proper and complete inquiry, properly set up and conducted. We want closure AFAP and do not want a 2nd or even a 3rd inquiry as happened with Hilsborough.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Trevor.

    Interview with Advocate Philip Sinel PART ONE.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Trevor.

    Exclusive Interview with Advocate Philip Sinel PART TWO.

    ReplyDelete
  44. If it wasn't World Cup launch night would likely publish an hilarious 'anonymous' comment from infamous cyber bully Jon the Troll.

    Seems Jon is getting a bit twitchy about Deputy Higgins apparently having a question lodged about cyber bullying. Why ever could our Jon be so jumpy?

    I mean, its not as if there are now double figure complaints from some of his victims to the police or some such...is it? As I always say the truth always outs in the end!

    Personally can't wait to hear Jon explain his - witnessed - boasts that he is protected in his cowardly thuggery by our senior police AND the Data Protection Commissioner! Hmmmm... add in witnesses ready to demand justice and the Day of Reckoning appears to be drawing near at last...

    ReplyDelete
  45. Hope to - possibly - get a post up in next day or two. After that closing the blog down for the summer at least. Too much more to focus on. Second evidence session coming up to COI and much more. Full details in time.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Trevor.

    Jersey Child Abuse Inquiry and the disgraced "HEALTH" DEPARTMENT.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Message for Admin: can you give me a call please ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Stafford Police called me a "Mentally ill attention seeker" when I reported the death threat made to me on my blog, and it DOES constitute a death threat to threaten to burn down someones house, though Stafford Police don't seem to think so!

    ReplyDelete