Another snapshot of the Jersey ‘justice’
system – where ‘the law’ is changeable according to who you are…
Being pleased to receive some assistance from our
cousins across the channel in France relating to our Strasbourg application –
this arising out of complete disbelief on their part at how those who control
Jersey’s ‘justice’ system continue to twist and abuse it at will to secure the
desired Establishment result – the conversation got me on to thinking of how
the Data Protection ‘law’ was infamously manipulated against former Senator
Stuart Syvret.
Indeed, the timing for putting up this post seemed
pretty ideal as I had decided that due to some rather interesting ‘happenings’ I
have set for around the end of September/October I needed to take a break from regular
blogging at least until nearer the election. And secondly, I had just had yet
another experience of what passes for ‘law’ in the Birt and Bailhache epoch Jersey
Twilight Zone via Viscount Michael Wilkins’ collusion with the State media
regarding our politically manipulated ‘Désastre’.
More about this episode in a future post no doubt. Yet
in the meantime please check out this link to my interview on the excellent Voiceforchildren Blog.
Stuart Syvret and the notorious Data
Protection ‘secret court case’ scam
Here, should any readers not be aware, four Establishment
proxies (there was actually meant to be five but one refused to go along with
the ruse having been written to by Data Protection asking him to come in and
join them) including one middle-aged, internet troll and convicted petty
criminal we shall call for the sake of humour and upsetting his sense of
deluded importance, Boozy D’ Eathreat were provided with the better part of
£500,000 of our taxpayers’ money by the Data Protection Commissioner’s Office.
These monies being to cover ‘legal advice’ costs to take former Senator Syvret
to court and prosecute him regarding material on his internet blog.
The actual cost of the whole scam in fact ran in to
millions as I know firsthand from one of those involved in the process. However,
what really needs to be focussed on for the purposes of this particular post is
that Mr D’ Eathreat was allowed access to this taxpayer’s money despite
the fact that what Stuart Syvret had actually written about him being an
abusive and cowardly cyber bully was demonstrably true. As at least nine other
complainants to the police I am now aware of can confirm. Imagine that, readers
– in Jersey such is the break down of law and order that you can now actually
be taken to court for telling the truth! All our judiciary need to do to
succeed is simply ban you from providing the evidence or calling any witnesses.
Yet it must also be flagged up – especially given the
anti-Syvret propaganda pumped out by Establishment Party organs such as the
Jersey Evening Pravda – that whatever one thinks about the former Senator’s decision
to name the secret court case proxies on his blog it remains an undeniable
truth that the former Senator does have a wholly sustainable defence in his
claim to have done so in what he considered to be – rightly or wrongly – the ‘public
interest’. Certainly one hell of a stronger case than Viscount Wilkins’ has in his
pandering to the whims of his mates in the Establishment court and media in our
‘Désastre’ case!
The differing judicial attitude to
Syvret and Boozy D’ Eathreat actually sums up ‘the Jersey Way’ to a T
You see this Establishment proxy – a perma-Stella-ed, work-shy,
scumbag, who has for years viciously attacked not just Syvret himself but many
others including Shona and myself and even victims of child abuse on the
internet using a whole plethora of fake avatars (James Le Gallais, James Pearce,
Sue Young, Julie Hanning, Percy Luce, Monty Man Hunter etcetera) to try and
conceal his sick and cowardly actions can have no such defence whatsoever. NONE!
Boozy D’ Eathreat’s abuse of innocent people is down to pure, twisted maliciousness
and jealousy. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Yet guess what? When approached for the same support
to take this truly horrible bully to court - surprise, surprise - the Data
Protection Commissioner claimed that she ‘could not do so’. Because this
internet troll is apparently – and I quote here: ‘not a data controller like
Syvret is’. In fact according to the Data Protection Commissioner’s very own words
once again our Mr D’ Eathreat ‘is just a kitchen table blogger’. ‘Syvret’ in
contrast she told me ‘even calls himself a journalist.’
Wondering what a ‘kitchen table blogger’
is?
Me too!
Because, even though I asked the Commissioner to kindly explain, her
answers left me largely none the wiser. You see someone writing on the internet
can call him or her self whatever they like – investigative journalist;
reporter; political activist – anything. Most of course use plain and simple
old ‘blogger’. The best are also quite open about who they – we - are.
The key issue here then is that such claims don’t
actually automatically have any legal standing whatsoever. Syvret, after all,
may use the term ‘journalist’ even though – just like other individuals such as
Mr Rico Sorda for example – he is not actually employed or contracted by
anyone. Indeed, such people in truth are ‘employed’ only by their social
conscience; their ‘contract’ being only with their commitment to social justice.
Indeed, it is a similar story with the guff used in
court against Syvret in throwing around the term ‘data controller’. Is Syvret
any more a ‘data controller’ writing his blog than the sick and vicious
internet troll who sets up and controls fake political forums where he uses
avatars to both register it and spout his easily identifiable hatred as if this
was coming from real people?
Or who even sets up bogus blogs - again registered
under fake names - to do the same? Indeed, is Syvret or any other of us who
write in our own name on personal and genuine blogs more of a ‘data controller’
than the sick and twisted troll who undoubtedly ‘controls’ the hateful bile he
pumps out – i.e. the ‘information’ via Twitter of Facebook? Hateful information
we know even pillars of the State media such as BBC Jersey Managing Editor, Jon
Gripton are evidently happy to re-tweet as ‘amusing’.
No - Syvret is not
The truth is this whole ‘data controller’ concept is
actually one originally intended to be utilised in relation to big business and
institutions and was never constructed with the idea of being used
against the likes of Syvret at all. It has simply been seized upon here in the
courts of Jersey – the Hazzard County of the English Channel – as a convenient additional
tool of Establishment oppression. (Who is Jersey’s Boss Hogg? Answers on a
postcard…)
As for an individual like our Mr D’ Eathreat being
able to pump out his cowardly hate to bully people he becomes fixated upon year
after year without fear of falling foul of either Data Protection or the police
because he is a ‘kitchen table blogger’ this also utter garbage. The term’s
legal standing is zero. Both agencies are fully aware of who this creature is
and what he does. They both know there is a huge file of complaints about him.
They also know that he could – as both honest local and UK police
officers have confirmed to me - be charged under the Harassment Law and should
have been.
But charged he isn’t
As for me personally, having pursued all of the
correct complaint procedures following the years of sickening and vicious abuse
from this social inadequate scumbag and yet still seen the authorities do absolutely
nothing I actually can’t wait to be taken to court having decided my last
resort was to stand up to this thug.
You see one little thing the Jersey Establishment
Party may not have realised in deliberately allowing this freak’s reign of
abuse to go on and on is that - finally - there are a great many of his
victims who are now willing to give evidence about the how they have been
abused and then betrayed by the authorities meant to protect them. And unlike James
Pearce, James Le Gallais, Sue Young, Julie Hanning, Alan Gower and Uncle Tom
Cobbley and all – they are all real!
Keep the Faith
PS
In the meantime should you be one of this thug’s
victims yet somehow suddenly find yourself down the police station due to one
of his own bogus complaints (D’ Eathreat has made dozens of them!) please just
remember this.. The police actually need a Centenier to charge you. It
can’t – as it appears happened recently - be attempted by a couple of the mates
the troll is always bragging about. And when you get out of the station if you
haven’t got anyone else to turn to feel free to give me a call so I can add
your name to the list…
